IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lily Schmear Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Fox Cities Stars USHS-W 19 2 9 11 0.579 0.1741 0.1741 — —
2021-22 Team Wisconsin 16U AAA 16U-AAA-W 34 1 2 3 0.088 0.0395 0.0395 — —
2022-23 Team Wisconsin 16U AAA 16U-AAA-W 26 0 2 2 0.077 0.0345 0.0330 — —
2023-24 Milwaukee Jr. Admirals 19U 19U-AAA-W 51 3 3 6 0.118 0.0400 0.0390 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Chatham D3 — SO 24 2 1 3 0.125
2024-25 Chatham D3 UCHC — 23 1 2 3 0.130
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2024-25 · Chatham
+276.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6166
Defenseman overall
#644
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Brinna Dochniak
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ RIT (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bowlby
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Sylvie Wallin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Princeton (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ellie Larson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ RIT (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Heather Olson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brinna Dochniak
RIT ·
0.111 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Grace Bowlby
Wisconsin ·
0.316 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Sylvie Wallin
Princeton ·
0.333 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.