← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taryn Dornseif Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Gentry Academy (women) USHS-MN-W 22 2 1 3 0.136 0.0206 0.0206
2021-22 Gentry Academy (women) USHS-MN-W 31 5 4 9 0.290 0.0438 0.0438
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SR 22 0 1 1 0.045
2024-25 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC JR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC 13 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SO 10 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC 11 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC FR 25 5 3 8 0.320
2022-23 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC 25 5 3 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2022-23 · Saint Mary's
+753.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13420
Forward overall
#5526
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Penn State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Yale
0.04 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

RIT ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin ·
0.525 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Penn State ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.