IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Audrey McClurg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-09-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Delano/Rockford High (women) USHS-MN-W 19 0 2 2 0.105 0.0159 0.0159 — —
2021-22 Delano/Rockford High (women) USHS-MN-W 27 7 7 14 0.518 0.0783 0.0783 — —
2022-23 Delano/Rockford High (women) USHS-MN-W 26 3 3 6 0.231 0.0349 0.0343 — —
2023-24 Delano/Rockford High (women) USHS-MN-W 27 4 7 11 0.407 0.0615 0.0579 — —
2024-25 Delano/Rockford High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 3 10 13 0.520 0.0785 0.0709 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4181
Defenseman overall
#507
Defenseman born in 2006
#3513
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Kelsey Crow
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tristen Truax
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Adolfsson
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.06 PPG
→ Penn State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Paige Michel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ UConn (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Jackson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelsey Crow
Penn State ·
0.160 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Tristen Truax
Minnesota State ·
0.167 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessica Adolfsson
Penn State ·
0.343 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.