← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Linnell Horschel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-02-08 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.05
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0551
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.15
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.1563
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

2%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
98%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Dimond West High USHS-W 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.0551 0.0551
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Adrian NCHA FR 10 0 0 0 0.000

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Lauren Niska USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG 0.000 Minnesota Duluth
Kate Glover USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG 0.167 Harvard
Abby Ecker USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG 0.000 Bemidji State
Ellie Larson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG 0.143 RIT
Jordan Jackson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG 0.130 Minnesota State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Nora McConnell 2023-24 · 0.39 PPG 0.385 St. Olaf MIAC
Cassidy Yaun 2022-23 · 0.39 PPG — Trinity NESCAC
Emma Halweg 2022-23 · 0.36 PPG — Saint Benedict MIAC
Ava Johansson 2022-23 · 1.23 PPG 0.130 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Rylie Griffiths 2025-26 · 0.37 PPG — Post NE10

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.