Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Québec As M18 AAA | QMAAA-W | 24 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.167 | 0.0244 | 0.0234 |
| 2022-23 | Cégep Limoilou Titans | QCHL-W | 29 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.069 | 0.0187 | 0.0192 |
| 2023-24 | Cégep Limoilou Titans | QCHL-W | 30 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.200 | 0.0543 | 0.0532 |
| 2024-25 | Cégep Limoilou Titans | QCHL-W | 30 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.233 | 0.0633 | 0.0588 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | King's | UCHC | FR | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2025-26 | Wilkes | UCHC | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abby Ecker | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG | 0.000 | Bemidji State |
| Lauren Niska | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Kate Glover | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG | 0.167 | Harvard |
| Jordan Jackson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG | 0.130 | Minnesota State |
| Tristen Truax | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG | 0.167 | Minnesota State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivia Stewart | 2023-24 · 0.34 PPG | 0.519 | Southern Maine | NEHC |
| Mary Kremer | 2015-16 · 1.78 PPG | 0.111 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | WIAC |
| Kylie Ligday | 2021-22 · 0.70 PPG | 0.280 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Maeve Hourihan | 2016-17 · 0.23 PPG | 0.867 | Arcadia | UCHC |
| Corrine Brown | 2018-19 · 0.59 PPG | 0.333 | Saint Benedict | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.