| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Park High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0.280 | 0.0423 | 0.0423 | — | — |
| 2017-18 | Park High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 22 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.364 | 0.0549 | 0.0549 | — | — |
| 2018-19 | Park High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 0.667 | 0.1007 | 0.1007 | — | — |
| 2019-20 | Park High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 0.880 | 0.1329 | 0.1329 | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Park High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 16 | 11 | 3 | 14 | 0.875 | 0.1321 | 0.1321 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Saint Benedict | D3 | MIAC | SR | 24 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0.333 |
| 2023-24 | Saint Benedict | D3 | MIAC | JR | 25 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.240 |
| 2022-23 | Saint Benedict | D3 | MIAC | SO | 15 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.400 |
| 2021-22 | Saint Benedict | D3 | MIAC | FR | 21 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.095 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.