← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shauna Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Park High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 4 3 7 0.280 0.0423 0.0423
2017-18 Park High (women) USHS-MN-W 22 2 6 8 0.364 0.0549 0.0549
2018-19 Park High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 5 11 16 0.667 0.1007 0.1007
2019-20 Park High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 14 8 22 0.880 0.1329 0.1329
2020-21 Park High (women) USHS-MN-W 16 11 3 14 0.875 0.1321 0.1321
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Saint Benedict D3 MIAC SR 24 4 4 8 0.333
2023-24 Saint Benedict D3 MIAC JR 25 2 4 6 0.240
2022-23 Saint Benedict D3 MIAC SO 15 2 4 6 0.400
2021-22 Saint Benedict D3 MIAC FR 21 2 0 2 0.095
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2021-22 · Saint Benedict
+35.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6303
Forward overall
#263
Forward born in 2003
#1452
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Catherine · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.