IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maiah Robert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 5 10 15 0.625 0.0944 0.0944 — —
2017-18 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 1 7 8 0.320 0.0483 0.0483 — —
2018-19 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 2 3 5 0.208 0.0315 0.0315 — —
2019-20 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 2 5 7 0.280 0.0423 0.0423 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 St. Catherine D3 MIAC SR 25 0 5 5 0.200
2022-23 St. Catherine D3 MIAC JR 25 1 7 8 0.320
2021-22 St. Catherine D3 MIAC SO 25 2 4 6 0.240
2020-21 St. Catherine D3 MIAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5710
Defenseman overall
#4994
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Heather Olson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Xylia Lang
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Rachel Herzog
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Serena Sommerfield
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Boston College
0.04 No data
NCAAe PPG
Katie Carlson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alexis Larsen
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lilah Bauer
Franklin Pierce · 2023-24
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rose Mroczka
Amherst · 2016-17
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.