icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Roseville High | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.120 | 0.0193 | 0.0193 | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Roseville High | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.040 | 0.0064 | 0.0064 | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Roseville High | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.200 | 0.0321 | 0.0321 | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Roseville High | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.400 | 0.0642 | 0.0642 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Lindenwood | D1 | — | — | 21 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.048 |
| 2015-16 | Lindenwood | D1 | — | — | 33 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.091 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.