IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Heather Olson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Bemidji High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 0 2 2 0.080 0.0128 0.0128 — —
2012-13 Bemidji High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 0 5 5 0.208 0.0335 0.0335 — —
2013-14 Bemidji High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 2 4 6 0.273 0.0438 0.0438 — —
2014-15 Bemidji High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 7 6 13 0.542 0.0870 0.0870 — —
2015-16 Bemidji High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 3 6 9 0.360 0.0578 0.0578 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W SR 36 2 7 9 0.250
2018-19 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W JR 36 0 3 3 0.083
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W SO 36 0 3 3 0.083
2016-17 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W FR 26 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 7 0 1 1 0.143
2004-05 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 23 1 0 1 0.043
2003-04 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 23 1 0 1 0.043
2002-03 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 25 1 2 3 0.120

NCAAe Rankings

#4308
Defenseman overall
#3684
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Lauren Niska
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kate Glover
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Harvard (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Paige Michel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ UConn (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Abby Ecker
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.07 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ellie Larson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ RIT (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lauren Niska
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kate Glover
Harvard ·
0.167 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Paige Michel
UConn ·
0.348 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.