← New Search ↗ Social Card

Katie Carlson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-02-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Camb-Isanti/Mora/PC (W) USHS-MN-W 22 3 1 4 0.182 0.0292 0.0292
2013-14 Camb-Isanti/Mora/PC (W) USHS-MN-W 24 5 6 11 0.458 0.0736 0.0736
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC 11 1 1 2 0.182
2018-19 Hamline D3 MIAC 29 6 8 14 0.483
2017-18 RIT D1 CHA-W 5 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#4784
Defenseman overall
#364
Defenseman born in 1998
#4148
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.06 PPG
→ Penn State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.07 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota ·
0.167 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Penn State ·
0.343 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.130 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.