IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Julia Surgenor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Kimball Union NE-Prep-Girls 20 4 1 5 0.250 0.1551 0.1551 — —
2014-15 Kimball Union NE-Prep-Girls 24 3 9 12 0.500 0.3103 0.3103 — —
2015-16 Kimball Union NE-Prep-Girls 27 6 5 11 0.410 0.2544 0.2544 — —
2016-17 Kimball Union NE-Prep-Girls 23 4 3 7 0.300 0.1862 0.1862 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC — 22 7 6 13 0.591
2020-21 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 9 3 0 3 0.333
2018-19 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 19 2 1 3 0.158
2017-18 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC FR 24 4 8 12 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2017-18 · Bowdoin
+173.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4787
Forward overall
#311
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Holly Dietzler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Bonfe
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kylie Hanley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Vilma Tanskanen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Amanda Bäckebo
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Syracuse (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Macy Peterson
Post · 2022-23
0.194 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sydney Smith
Adrian · 2014-15
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kaytlin Johnson
Concordia Wisconsin · 2015-16
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.