IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Abby Brush Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Barrington High (IL) USHS-W 9 3 2 5 0.556 0.1671 0.1671 — —
2016-17 Chicago Young Americans 19U JWHL-U19 24 5 4 9 0.375 0.1408 0.1408 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Plattsburgh State D3 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 25 12 12 24 0.960
2019-20 Plattsburgh State D3 — — 25 12 12 24 0.960
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 25 12 12 24 0.960
2018-19 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 31 11 13 24 0.774
2018-19 Plattsburgh State D3 — — 31 11 13 24 0.774
2018-19 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 31 11 13 24 0.774
2017-18 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 28 5 13 18 0.643
2017-18 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 28 5 13 18 0.643
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2017-18 · Plattsburgh
+396.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6659
Forward overall

D1 Comparables

Renee Saltness
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tianna Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Amanda Bäckebo
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Syracuse (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Janna Haeg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kendall Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Colgate
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jenna Timm
Saint Benedict · 2018-19
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elena Gualtieri
Connecticut College · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jenna Curtis
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.