IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kelly O'Sullivan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-10-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Loyola Academy USHS-W 21 5 6 11 0.524 0.1575 0.1575 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 28 4 22 26 0.929
2018-19 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 31 7 14 21 0.677
2017-18 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 29 7 23 30 1.034
2016-17 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 31 11 26 37 1.194
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.19
2016-17 · Adrian
+702.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1543
Defenseman overall
#180
Defenseman born in 1996
#1904
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Allison Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Audrey McClurg
Concordia · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Berthiaume
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.259 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bella Wagner
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.