← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Kelly O'Sullivan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-10-18 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.26
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2719
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.59
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.6199
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2011-12 Loyola Academy USHS-W 21 5 6 11 0.524 0.0445 0.0445
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2019-20 Adrian NCHA SR 28 4 22 26 0.929
2018-19 Adrian NCHA JR 31 7 14 21 0.677
2017-18 Adrian NCHA SO 29 7 23 30 1.034
2016-17 Adrian NCHA FR 31 11 26 37 1.194

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Ellie Larson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG 0.143 RIT
Sylvie Wallin USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG 0.333 Princeton
Kate Glover USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG 0.167 Harvard
Brinna Dochniak USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG 0.111 RIT
Grace Bowlby USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG 0.316 Wisconsin

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Amanda Smythe 2024-25 · 1.16 PPG 0.105 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Kaitlin Roberts 2023-24 · 0.31 PPG — Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Karin Knapp 2015-16 · 0.29 PPG — Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Natalie Heutmaker 2024-25 · 0.42 PPG 0.280 Norwich LittleEast
Sophie Johnson 2023-24 · 0.77 PPG 0.143 St. Scholastica NCHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.