IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anna Zumwinkle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 0 2 2 0.080 0.0121 0.0121 — —
2012-13 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 2 5 7 0.280 0.0423 0.0423 — —
2013-14 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 2 8 10 0.400 0.0604 0.0604 — —
2014-15 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 3 14 17 0.680 0.1027 0.1027 — —
2015-16 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 3 17 20 0.800 0.1208 0.1208 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Middlebury D3 NESCAC — 27 3 11 14 0.518
2018-19 Middlebury D3 NESCAC — 26 5 8 13 0.500
2017-18 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SO 28 3 4 7 0.250
2016-17 Middlebury D3 NESCAC FR 28 4 5 9 0.321
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2016-17 · Middlebury
+199.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2597
Defenseman overall
#2024
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Allison Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ebba Strandberg
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Maine (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Flaherty
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ North Dakota
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mollie Koch
Saint Mary's · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Sadie Storm
Post · 2018-19
0.543 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Katherine Nejedlo
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2011-12
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.