IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bill Maday Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-02-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 33 10 11 21 0.636 0.3912 0.3907 1.8750 1.8726
2007-08 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 60 24 35 59 0.983 0.6044 0.5726 2.8970 2.7447
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Notre Dame D1 CCHA-orig SR 40 12 15 27 0.675
2010-11 Notre Dame D1 CCHA-orig JR 44 10 17 27 0.614
2009-10 Notre Dame D1 — SO 30 7 14 21 0.700
2008-09 Notre Dame D1 — FR 39 16 14 30 0.769
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.43
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2008-09 · Notre Dame
+79.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5148
Forward overall
#211
Forward born in 1988
#297
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Vecchione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dominik Shine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Chad McDonald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joona Juntunen
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Landrigan
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.