IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hannah Koniar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 University School USHS-W 24 0 5 5 0.208 0.0626 0.0626 — —
2013-14 University School USHS-W 24 6 10 16 0.667 0.2005 0.2005 — —
2014-15 University School USHS-W 24 2 12 14 0.583 0.1754 0.1754 — —
2015-16 University School USHS-W 24 5 11 16 0.667 0.2005 0.2005 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Marian D3 NCHA — 12 1 4 5 0.417
2019-20 Marian D3 NCHA — 18 1 2 3 0.167
2018-19 Marian D3 NCHA — 25 4 3 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2018-19 · Marian
+55.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1073
Defenseman overall
#1508
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dani Sadek
Ohio State ·
0.611 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Grace Bizal
Boston College ·
0.268 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
Union ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.