| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | — | USHL | 52 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 0.365 | 0.2327 | 0.2271 | 1.0950 | 1.0686 |
| 2007-08 | Sioux City Musketeers | USHL | 60 | 23 | 26 | 49 | 0.817 | 0.5201 | 0.4809 | 2.4474 | 2.2628 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC | SR | 34 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 0.353 |
| 2024-25 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC | JR | 28 | 5 | 18 | 23 | 0.821 |
| 2023-24 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC | SO | 32 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 0.844 |
| 2022-23 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC | FR | 33 | 13 | 15 | 28 | 0.849 |
| 2016-17 | St. Olaf | D3 | — | SO | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.333 |
| 2015-16 | St. Olaf | D3 | — | FR | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2011-12 | Minnesota | D1 | — | SR | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.100 |
| 2010-11 | Minnesota | D1 | — | JR | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2009-10 | Minnesota | D1 | — | SO | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2008-09 | Minnesota | D1 | — | FR | 16 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.188 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.