IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ava Jaschke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Ridley College JWHL-U19 24 3 2 5 0.208 0.0782 0.0782 — —
2017-18 Ridley College JWHL-U19 27 3 2 5 0.185 0.0695 0.0695 — —
2018-19 Biggby Coffee AAA Hockey 19U 19U-AAA-W 63 11 15 26 0.413 0.1405 0.1405 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 29 4 17 21 0.724
2021-22 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 29 6 15 21 0.724
2020-21 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 27 3 3 6 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2019-20 · St. Norbert
+109.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2812
Defenseman overall

D1 Comparables

Ebba Strandberg
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Maine (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Allison Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ebba Strandberg
Maine ·
0.333 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Kenzie Prater
Quinnipiac ·
0.432 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
Wisconsin ·
0.350 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.