IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kaitlyn Blair Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-11-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Prague High USHS-MN-W 24 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 New Prague High USHS-MN-W 21 8 10 18 0.857 0.1294 0.1294 — —
2015-16 New Prague High USHS-MN-W 25 16 16 32 1.280 0.1933 0.1933 — —
2016-17 New Prague High USHS-MN-W 25 8 10 18 0.720 0.1087 0.1087 — —
2017-18 New Prague High USHS-MN-W 25 12 16 28 1.120 0.1691 0.1691 — —
2018-19 New Prague High USHS-MN-W 25 11 14 25 1.000 0.1510 0.1510 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 St. Catherine D3 — — 25 5 9 14 0.560
2021-22 St. Catherine D3 — — 24 4 11 15 0.625
2019-20 St. Catherine D3 — — 24 2 4 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2019-20 · St. Catherine
+67.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1476
Defenseman overall
#220
Defenseman born in 2000
#1080
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ebba Strandberg
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Maine (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mekenzie Steffen
Wisconsin ·
0.350 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Kate Hallett
Harvard ·
0.100 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Robinson
Minnesota ·
0.129 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.