IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brooke Remington Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-10-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Forest Lake High (MN women) USHS-MN-W 25 5 6 11 0.440 0.0664 0.0664 — —
2017-18 Forest Lake High (MN women) USHS-MN-W 23 17 7 24 1.044 0.1576 0.1576 — —
2018-19 Forest Lake High (MN women) USHS-MN-W 25 14 24 38 1.520 0.2295 0.2295 — —
2019-20 Forest Lake High (MN women) USHS-MN-W 22 10 23 33 1.500 0.2265 0.2265 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 16 0 3 3 0.188
2022-23 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 30 2 12 14 0.467
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA — 30 9 10 19 0.633
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D3 — SO 30 9 10 19 0.633
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA — 2 0 3 3 1.500
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D3 — FR 2 0 3 3 1.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.50
2020-21 · Franklin Pierce
+691.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#714
Defenseman overall
#140
Defenseman born in 2001
#448
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Christa Vuglar
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG
→ RIT (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dani Sadek
Ohio State ·
0.611 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Grace Bizal
Boston College ·
0.268 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
Union ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.