← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marah Wagner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-10-19 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Seattle Torrent · PWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 NAHA White 19U AAA JWHL-U19 27 14 10 24 0.889 0.2956 0.2904
2024-25 Skellefteå AIK SDHL 32 5 9 14 0.438 0.5053 0.4862
2025-26 Seattle Torrent PWHL 20 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 RPI D1 ECAC-W GR 35 6 15 21 0.600
2022-23 RPI D1 ECAC-W SR 34 4 13 17 0.500
2021-22 RPI D1 ECAC-W JR 32 11 10 21 0.656
2020-21 Robert Morris D1 CHA-W 25 7 3 10 0.400
2019-20 Robert Morris D1 CHA-W 36 1 4 5 0.139
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2019-20 · Robert Morris
-44.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1033
Forward overall
#51
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.17 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota ·
1.073 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
North Dakota ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.