| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | NAHA White 19U AAA | JWHL-U19 | 27 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 0.889 | 0.2956 | 0.2904 | — | — |
| 2024-25 | Skellefteå AIK | SDHL | 32 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 0.438 | 0.5053 | 0.4862 | — | — |
| 2025-26 | Seattle Torrent | PWHL | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | RPI | D1 | ECAC-W | GR | 35 | 6 | 15 | 21 | 0.600 |
| 2022-23 | RPI | D1 | ECAC-W | SR | 34 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 0.500 |
| 2021-22 | RPI | D1 | ECAC-W | JR | 32 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 0.656 |
| 2020-21 | Robert Morris | D1 | CHA-W | — | 25 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 0.400 |
| 2019-20 | Robert Morris | D1 | CHA-W | — | 36 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.139 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.