IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kiera Dempsey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-01-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 NAHA Red 16U 16U-AAA-W 63 16 12 28 0.444 0.1790 0.1768 — —
2022-23 NAHA White 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 59 7 19 26 0.441 0.1523 0.1562 — —
2023-24 NAHA White 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 78 8 12 20 0.256 0.0886 0.0852 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston College D1 HEA-W — 35 0 4 4 0.114
2024-25 Boston College D1 HEA-W — 22 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2736
Defenseman overall
#358
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Lauren Boyle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Brittney Anderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Rydland
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Emma Turbyville
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mckenzie Revering
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lauren Boyle
Ohio State ·
0.486 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Brittney Anderson
St. Cloud State ·
0.571 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Kate Rydland
Penn State ·
0.161 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.