← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Rylie Griffiths Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-08-05 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
Post
Verbal NEWHA D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.08
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0847
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.17
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.1767
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

0%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
100%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Stoney Creek Sabres OWHL-U22 38 1 4 5 0.132 0.0461 0.0474
2024-25 Northwood School NE-Prep-Girls 71 3 8 11 0.155 0.0503 0.0481
2025-26 Northwood School NE-Prep-Girls 73 4 23 27 0.370 0.1201 0.1091
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Taylor Flaherty USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG 0.000 North Dakota
Briana Jorde USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG 0.077 Bemidji State
Allison Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG 0.000 Quinnipiac
Cheyenne Harris USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.324 Union
Taylor Turnquist USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.171 Clarkson

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Kylie Ligday 2022-23 · 0.81 PPG 0.280 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Delaney Kingsland 2016-17 · 0.41 PPG 0.556 Lawrence NCHA
Mara Teschendorf 2010-11 · 1.10 PPG 0.208 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC
Mackenzie Molnar 2015-16 · 0.88 PPG 0.259 Augsburg MIAC
Georgia Eger 2013-14 · 0.76 PPG 0.300 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.