← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Kaidence Wright Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-03-09 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
Lindenwood
Verbal WCHA-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.18
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1890
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.37
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.3942
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

25%
NCAA D1W
5%
NCAA D3W
70%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Frederick Gunn School NE-Prep-Girls 22 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
2024-25 Frederick Gunn School NE-Prep-Girls 27 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
2025-26 Northwood School NE-Prep-Girls 73 7 36 43 0.589 0.1913 0.1890
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Kendra Nealey USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG 0.212 Cornell
Grace Bizal USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG 0.268 Boston College
Dani Sadek USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.38 PPG 0.611 Ohio State
Kate Hallett USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.100 Harvard
Katie Robinson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.129 Minnesota

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Addie Fee 2023-24 · 0.81 PPG 0.480 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC
Reese Swanson 2022-23 · 1.48 PPG 0.267 St. Olaf MIAC
Samantha Pool 2022-23 · 0.50 PPG 0.800 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Victoria Nelson 2022-23 · 0.85 PPG 0.480 St. Scholastica NCHA
Taylor Lesnar 2023-24 · 1.07 PPG 0.357 St. Norbert NCHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.