icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Andover | NE-Prep-Girls | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2006-07 | Andover | NE-Prep-Girls | 22 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.090 | 0.0414 | 0.0414 | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Worcester Blades | CWHL | 24 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.167 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Boston College | D1 | HEA-W | — | 21 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.048 |
| 2011-12 | Boston College | D1 | HEA-W | SR | 33 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.182 |
| 2010-11 | Boston College | D1 | HEA-W | JR | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2008-09 | Boston College | D1 | HEA-W | FR | 32 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.156 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.