icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Stillwater High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.040 | 0.0064 | 0.0064 | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Stillwater High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.240 | 0.0385 | 0.0385 | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Stillwater High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 0.600 | 0.0964 | 0.0964 | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Stillwater High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 0.760 | 0.1221 | 0.1221 | — | — |
| 2019-20 | Connecticut Whale | PHF | 10 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.200 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | RIT | D1 | CHA-W | — | 25 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.040 |
| 2017-18 | RIT | D1 | CHA-W | JR | 35 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.029 |
| 2016-17 | RIT | D1 | CHA-W | SO | 33 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.091 |
| 2015-16 | RIT | D1 | CHA-W | FR | 36 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.111 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.