IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Danielle Serdachny Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-12 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Seattle Torrent · PWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Pursuit of Excellence CSSHL-U18W 28 24 34 58 2.071 0.4746 0.4746 — —
2024-25 Ottawa Charge PWHL 30 2 6 8 0.267 — — — —
2025-26 Seattle Torrent PWHL 30 7 9 16 0.533 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Colgate D1 ECAC-W GR 40 22 39 61 1.525
2022-23 Colgate D1 ECAC-W SR 40 25 46 71 1.775
2021-22 Colgate D1 ECAC-W JR 39 15 38 53 1.359
2020-21 Colgate D1 ECAC-W SO 23 9 12 21 0.913
2019-20 Colgate D1 ECAC-W FR 38 10 22 32 0.842
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.84
2019-20 · Colgate
+107.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 1 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#756
Forward overall
#34
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Emma Nuutinen
North Dakota ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dana Rasmussen
Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Reagan Haley
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.