IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isabel Wunder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Durham West Jr. Lightning OWHL-U22 30 32 51 83 2.767 0.9672 0.9672 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Princeton D1 ECAC-W SR 34 27 16 43 1.265
2024-25 Princeton D1 ECAC-W JR 32 26 24 50 1.562
2023-24 Princeton D1 ECAC-W SO 32 8 27 35 1.094
2022-23 Princeton D1 ECAC-W FR 31 9 9 18 0.581
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.96
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2022-23 · Princeton
-39.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 29 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#75
Forward overall
#1
Forward born in 2003
#1
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Shayna Tomlinson
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Rensselaer (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.96 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brooke Avery
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.92 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.85 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Theresa Knutson
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 3.95 PPG
→ UConn (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
1.06 Average
NCAAe PPG
Maria Lindh
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.88 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shayna Tomlinson
Rensselaer ·
0.531 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooke Avery
New Hampshire ·
0.062 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrea Renner
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.