← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Emma Pickering Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-01-01 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.61
Strong (0.45–0.70)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.5930
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.87
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
1.28
Elite (1.00+)
Base D3e-W PPG1.3527
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

12%
NCAA D1W
2%
NCAA D3W
85%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2022-23 19U-AAA-W 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1368 0.1368
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 RIT CHA-W JR 26 11 15 26 1.000
2024-25 RIT CHA-W SO 37 11 11 22 0.595
2023-24 RIT CHA-W FR 34 5 7 12 0.353

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Ebba Strandberg SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG 0.333 Maine
Izzy Bagi 19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG 0.556 Holy Cross
Kenzie Prater USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG 0.432 Quinnipiac
Emma Turbyville NE-Prep-Girls · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG 0.040 St. Cloud State
Allison Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG 0.000 Quinnipiac

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Shelby Evans 2024-25 · 0.89 PPG St. Scholastica NCHA
Andrea Noss 2013-14 · 0.52 PPG 0.667 SUNY Oswego SUNYAC
Amber Meluzio 2024-25 · 0.79 PPG 0.464 Elmira UCHC
Cara Cook 2022-23 · 1.12 PPG 0.333 Aurora NCHA
Adrienne Hansen 2023-24 · 0.70 PPG 0.481 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.