IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lily Barrett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 0 7 7 0.280 0.0450 0.0450 — —
2019-20 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 3 7 10 0.400 0.0642 0.0642 — —
2020-21 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 19 3 15 18 0.947 0.1522 0.1522 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stonehill D1 NEWHA SR 31 3 4 7 0.226
2024-25 Stonehill D1 NEWHA JR 36 2 5 7 0.194
2023-24 Stonehill D1 NEWHA SO 37 0 6 6 0.162
2022-23 Stonehill D1 NEWHA FR 37 1 9 10 0.270
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2022-23 · Stonehill
+536.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2833
Defenseman overall
#354
Defenseman born in 2003
#2242
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Sylvie Wallin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Princeton (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ellie Larson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ RIT (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Paige Michel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ UConn (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Brinna Dochniak
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ RIT (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bowlby
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sylvie Wallin
Princeton ·
0.333 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Ellie Larson
RIT ·
0.143 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Paige Michel
UConn ·
0.348 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.