IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marin Jugnauth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-04-23 Country: Canada Height: 5'4" (162 cm)
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Calgary Edge School U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 18 1 3 4 0.222 0.0509 0.0509 — —
2023-24 Calgary Edge School U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 27 4 12 16 0.593 0.1358 0.1358 — —
2024-25 Barrie Sharks OWHL-U22 41 0 13 13 0.317 0.1110 0.1110 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Long Island Univ. D1 CHA-W FR 29 0 4 4 0.138
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2025-26 · Long Island Univ.
+20.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2672
Defenseman overall
#370
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Emma Turbyville
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Briana Jorde
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cheyenne Harris
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Union (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Turnquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Erica Schramel
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bailey Olson
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2017-18
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dynnea Bezona
Endicott · 2012-13
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.