← New Search ↗ Social Card

Olivia Paidosh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-05-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Holy Family/Waconia High USHS-MN-W 25 1 3 4 0.160 0.0257 0.0257
2018-19 Holy Family Catholic (women) USHS-MN-W 25 6 4 10 0.400 0.0642 0.0642
2019-20 Holy Family Catholic (women) USHS-MN-W 25 4 9 13 0.520 0.0835 0.0835
2020-21 Holy Family Catholic (women) USHS-MN-W 19 9 8 17 0.895 0.1437 0.1437
2021-22 Holy Family Catholic (women) USHS-MN-W 28 7 9 16 0.571 0.0918 0.0918
2022-23 Holy Family Catholic (women) USHS-MN-W 27 2 9 11 0.407 0.0654 0.0654
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W 16 2 1 3 0.188
2024-25 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W 23 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W 16 0 2 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2023-24 · Dartmouth
+74.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3132
Defenseman overall
#409
Defenseman born in 2004
#2479
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.07 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.06 PPG
→ Penn State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bemidji State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.130 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Penn State ·
0.343 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.