IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maria Roth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-10-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 16 0 2 2 0.125 0.0364 0.0364 — —
2023-24 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 57 1 8 9 0.158 0.0460 0.0460 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W — 38 0 3 3 0.079
2024-25 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W — 13 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4308
Defenseman overall
#506
Defenseman born in 2004
#3569
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Sylvie Wallin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Princeton (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ellie Larson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ RIT (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Paige Michel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ UConn (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Brinna Dochniak
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ RIT (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bowlby
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sylvie Wallin
Princeton ·
0.333 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Ellie Larson
RIT ·
0.143 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Paige Michel
UConn ·
0.348 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.