IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Moa Söderholm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-07-24 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
AIK · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 AIK SDHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 AIK SDHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 AIK SDHL 27 0 1 1 0.037 0.0427 0.0427 — —
2023-24 AIK SDHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New Hampshire D1 HEA-W SO 5 0 1 1 0.200
2024-25 New Hampshire D1 HEA-W FR 13 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5617
Defenseman overall
#523
Defenseman born in 2003
#697
in SDHL

D1 Comparables

Sylvie Wallin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Princeton (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Brinna Dochniak
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ RIT (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bowlby
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ellie Larson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ RIT (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Serena Sommerfield
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Boston College
0.04 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sylvie Wallin
Princeton ·
0.333 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Brinna Dochniak
RIT ·
0.111 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Grace Bowlby
Wisconsin ·
0.316 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.