IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anika Stromme Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-04-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Moorhead High (W) USHS-MN-W 21 1 3 4 0.191 0.0306 0.0306 — —
2022-23 Moorhead High (W) USHS-MN-W 31 3 6 9 0.290 0.0466 0.0466 — —
2023-24 Moorhead High (W) USHS-MN-W 28 6 11 17 0.607 0.0975 0.0975 — —
2024-25 Moorhead High (W) USHS-MN-W 31 2 13 15 0.484 0.0777 0.0777 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 32 0 1 1 0.031
2025-26 Minnesota State D1 CHA-W FR 29 0 1 1 0.035
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2025-26 · Minnesota
-61.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3697
Defenseman overall
#465
Defenseman born in 2007
#3055
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Kelsey Crow
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Emma Turbyville
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tristen Truax
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Adolfsson
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.06 PPG
→ Penn State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Boyle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelsey Crow
Penn State ·
0.160 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Turbyville
St. Cloud State ·
0.040 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Tristen Truax
Minnesota ·
0.167 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.