IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keith Muehlbauer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-01-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Eastview High (MN) USHS-MN 25 5 14 19 0.760 0.0962 0.0908 0.1846 0.1743
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 36 0 6 6 0.167
2017-18 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 38 2 1 3 0.079
2016-17 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 35 0 2 2 0.057
2015-16 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 24 1 0 1 0.042
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2015-16 · Maine
-51.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6592
Defenseman overall
#1262
Defenseman born in 1997
#1499
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

Alex Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Alec McCrea
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Clint Lewis
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
David Drake
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garrett Cecere
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Murphy
Curry · 2000-01
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Bernhardson
Concordia · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Creger
Norwich · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.