| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Dubuque Fighting Saints | USHL | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.167 | 0.0983 | 0.1066 | 0.5007 | 0.5431 |
| 2012-13 | Tri-City Storm | USHL | 58 | 3 | 13 | 16 | 0.276 | 0.1628 | 0.1679 | 0.8286 | 0.8546 |
| 2013-14 | — | USHL | 54 | 3 | 34 | 37 | 0.685 | 0.4042 | 0.3980 | 2.0579 | 2.0262 |
| 2015-16 | Sioux Falls Stampede | USHL | 53 | 2 | 12 | 14 | 0.264 | 0.1559 | 0.1386 | 0.7935 | 0.7054 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Northeastern | D1 | HockeyEast | SR | 38 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.237 |
| 2016-17 | Northeastern | D1 | HockeyEast | JR | 34 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.059 |
| 2015-16 | Colorado College | D1 | NCHC | — | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2014-15 | Colorado College | D1 | NCHC | — | 34 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.088 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.