← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Cecere Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-01-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.1025 0.1112 0.4911 0.5327
2012-13 Tri-City Storm USHL 58 3 13 16 0.276 0.1696 0.1749 0.8129 0.8384
2013-14 USHL 54 3 34 37 0.685 0.4212 0.4147 2.0187 1.9876
2015-16 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 53 2 12 14 0.264 0.1624 0.1444 0.7784 0.6920
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 38 0 9 9 0.237
2016-17 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 34 0 2 2 0.059
2015-16 Colorado College D1 NCHC 4 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Colorado College D1 NCHC 34 0 3 3 0.088
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2014-15 · Colorado College
-70.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4493
Defenseman overall
#816
Defenseman born in 1995
#2149
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2011-12
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.516 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.