← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tye Spencer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Kamloops Blazers WHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Kamloops Blazers WHL 16 2 0 2 0.125 0.0608 0.0608 0.3063 0.3063
2021-22 WHL 56 7 12 19 0.339 0.1651 0.1737 0.8314 0.8746
2022-23 Regina Pats WHL 39 11 7 18 0.462 0.2245 0.2257 1.1308 1.1369
2023-24 Regina Pats WHL 67 23 24 47 0.702 0.3413 0.3263 1.7189 1.6434
2024-25 Wenatchee Wild WHL 64 15 20 35 0.547 0.2661 0.2402 1.3401 1.2096
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 32 8 5 13 0.406
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2025-26 · Alaska Anchorage
+72.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17574
Forward overall
#882
Forward born in 2004
#665
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2008-09
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.