icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | — | BCHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2020-21 | — | WHL | 22 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 0.636 | 0.3094 | 0.3094 | 1.5533 | 1.5533 |
| 2021-22 | — | WHL | 68 | 16 | 26 | 42 | 0.618 | 0.3003 | 0.3200 | 1.5074 | 1.6065 |
| 2022-23 | — | WHL | 68 | 27 | 40 | 67 | 0.985 | 0.4791 | 0.4882 | 2.4049 | 2.4506 |
| 2023-24 | — | WHL | 65 | 24 | 31 | 55 | 0.846 | 0.4114 | 0.3990 | 2.0654 | 2.0029 |
| 2024-25 | — | WHL | 64 | 23 | 33 | 56 | 0.875 | 0.4254 | 0.3898 | 2.1357 | 1.9570 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Bowling Green | D1 | CCHA | — | 31 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0.161 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.