← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oren Shtrom Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 22 5 9 14 0.636 0.3096 0.3096 1.5545 1.5545
2021-22 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 60 9 10 19 0.317 0.1541 0.1641 0.7736 0.8237
2022-23 — WHL 24 2 9 11 0.458 0.2230 0.2270 1.1195 1.1397
2023-24 Prince George Cougars WHL 66 13 14 27 0.409 0.1990 0.1928 0.9993 0.9681
2024-25 Kamloops Blazers WHL 64 17 25 42 0.656 0.3192 0.2922 1.6029 1.4673
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 32 3 4 7 0.219
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2025-26 · Alaska Anchorage
1.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20687
Forward overall
#1118
Forward born in 2004
#790
in WHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2009-10
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Post · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.