← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyson Zimmer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Brandon Wheat Kings WHL 16 3 1 4 0.250 0.1216 0.1216 0.6126 0.6126
2021-22 Brandon Wheat Kings WHL 66 9 12 21 0.318 0.1548 0.1643 0.7797 0.8277
2022-23 Lethbridge Hurricanes WHL 64 19 29 48 0.750 0.3649 0.3703 1.8377 1.8651
2023-24 Vancouver Giants WHL 67 23 22 45 0.672 0.3267 0.3155 1.6456 1.5891
2024-25 Vancouver Giants WHL 35 10 15 25 0.714 0.3475 0.3170 1.7502 1.5966
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara D1 AHA FR 14 2 2 4 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2025-26 · Niagara
+5.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12025
Forward overall
#531
Forward born in 2004
#652
in WHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.161 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.