| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Victoria Royals | WHL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2021-22 | Victoria Royals | WHL | 38 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.079 | 0.0384 | 0.0417 | 0.1933 | 0.2098 |
| 2022-23 | Victoria Royals | WHL | 56 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.143 | 0.0695 | 0.0722 | 0.3501 | 0.3637 |
| 2023-24 | Victoria Royals | WHL | 50 | 6 | 16 | 22 | 0.440 | 0.2141 | 0.2118 | 1.0781 | 1.0667 |
| 2024-25 | Tri-City Americans | WHL | 56 | 5 | 20 | 25 | 0.446 | 0.2172 | 0.2033 | 1.0938 | 1.0238 |
| 2025-26 | Edmonton Oil Kings | WHL | 31 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.290 | 0.1412 | 0.1256 | 0.7113 | 0.6329 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | FR | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.