IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greg Whittle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-03-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Collingwood Blues OJHL 36 6 10 16 0.444 0.1089 0.1198 0.3060 0.3365
2008-09 — OJHL 27 2 6 8 0.296 0.0726 0.0761 0.2040 0.2139
2009-10 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 48 14 15 29 0.604 0.1481 0.1475 0.4160 0.4143
2010-11 — OJHL 37 13 16 29 0.784 0.1921 0.1824 0.5396 0.5123
2011-12 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 44 16 22 38 0.864 0.2117 0.1916 0.5946 0.5383
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 11 2 7 9 0.818
2014-15 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 27 8 17 25 0.926
2013-14 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 25 5 14 19 0.760
2012-13 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 26 8 11 19 0.731
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2012-13 · Elmira
+354.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23526
Forward overall
#855
Forward born in 1991
#1035
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Murphy
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Mortson
UMass Boston · 2022-23
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelvin Walz
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2013-14
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.