IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greg Whittle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-03-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Collingwood Blues OJHL 36 6 10 16 0.444 0.1242 0.1366 0.3067 0.3373
2008-09 — OJHL 27 2 6 8 0.296 0.0828 0.0868 0.2045 0.2144
2009-10 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 48 14 15 29 0.604 0.1688 0.1681 0.4170 0.4153
2010-11 — OJHL 37 13 16 29 0.784 0.2190 0.2079 0.5409 0.5135
2011-12 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 44 16 22 38 0.864 0.2413 0.2184 0.5960 0.5395
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 11 2 7 9 0.818
2014-15 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 27 8 17 25 0.926
2013-14 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 25 5 14 19 0.760
2012-13 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 26 8 11 19 0.731
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2012-13 · Elmira
+298.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18041
Forward overall
#711
Forward born in 1991
#1262
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Mortson
UMass Boston · 2022-23
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Murphy
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Burden
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.