← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Hvidston Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-11 Country: Canada
2022 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #139  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Swift Current Broncos WHL 58 13 19 32 0.552 0.2684 0.2852 1.3518 1.4362
2022-23 Swift Current Broncos WHL 59 21 44 65 1.102 0.5360 0.5445 2.6995 2.7421
2023-24 Swift Current Broncos WHL 53 27 32 59 1.113 0.5416 0.5234 2.7277 2.6362
2024-25 Calgary Hitmen WHL 68 19 37 56 0.824 0.4006 0.3658 2.0178 1.8423
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colorado College D1 NCHC FR 36 4 14 18 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2025-26 · Colorado College
+36.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6075
Forward overall
#203
Forward born in 2004
#232
in WHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.