IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Botten Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-07-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Caledon Admirals OJHL 47 11 14 25 0.532 0.1304 0.1329 0.3662 0.3731
2011-12 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 37 15 30 45 1.216 0.2981 0.2905 0.8374 0.8162
2012-13 — OJHL 49 22 58 80 1.633 0.4002 0.3701 1.1241 1.0396
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 23 6 20 26 1.130
2015-16 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 26 8 13 21 0.808
2014-15 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 27 9 29 38 1.407
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 30 10 24 34 1.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.13
2013-14 · SUNY Oswego
+291.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10604
Forward overall
#436
Forward born in 1992
#189
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Morgan
University of New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Keenan Hodgson
Amherst · 2013-14
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Kulas
Utica · 2006-07
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.