← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Botten Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-07-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Caledon Admirals OJHL 47 11 14 25 0.532 0.1486 0.1514 0.3671 0.3740
2011-12 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 37 15 30 45 1.216 0.3398 0.3312 0.8393 0.8180
2012-13 OJHL 49 22 58 80 1.633 0.4562 0.4219 1.1267 1.0420
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 SUNY Oswego D3 SR 23 6 20 26 1.130
2015-16 SUNY Oswego D3 JR 26 8 13 21 0.808
2014-15 SUNY Oswego D3 SO 27 9 29 38 1.407
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 FR 30 10 24 34 1.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.13
2013-14 · SUNY Oswego
+243.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7513
Forward overall
#320
Forward born in 1992
#214
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.