← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bauer Dumanski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-01-05 Country: Canada
North Dakota
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Prince George Cougars WHL 55 2 8 10 0.182 0.0884 0.0953 0.4461 0.4810
2022-23 Prince George Cougars WHL 68 2 11 13 0.191 0.0930 0.0959 0.4691 0.4839
2023-24 Prince George Cougars WHL 68 7 26 33 0.485 0.2361 0.2319 1.1908 1.1698
2024-25 Prince George Cougars WHL 58 4 14 18 0.310 0.1510 0.1403 0.7614 0.7073
2025-26 Prince George Cougars WHL 60 9 30 39 0.650 0.3162 0.2791 1.5949 1.4078
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4735
Defenseman overall
#1215
Defenseman born in 2005
#791
in WHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

North Dakota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

SJHL 2016-17
0.18
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
NAHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
USHL 2013-14
0.45
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
USHL 2023-24
0.16
actual FR PPG at North Dakota

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2017-18
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2010-11
1.556 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.