← New Search ↗ Social Card

Roger McQueen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-10-02 Country: Canada
2025 · Round 1, Pick #10  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 WHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.2432 0.2834 1.2268 1.4295
2022-23 WHL 55 4 10 14 0.255 0.1238 0.1385 0.6245 0.6985
2023-24 Brandon Wheat Kings WHL 53 21 30 51 0.962 0.4682 0.5006 2.3612 2.5247
2024-25 Brandon Wheat Kings WHL 17 10 10 20 1.177 0.5724 0.5815 2.8868 2.9325
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 36 11 16 27 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.51
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2025-26 · Providence
+46.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ Boston College (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.22 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.73 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.07 PPG
→ Michigan (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.