← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colton Roberts Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-06-08 Country: Canada
2024 · Round 5, Pick #131  ·  San Jose Sharks San Jose Sharks
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 — WHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0973 0.1118 0.4885 0.5614
2022-23 — WHL 62 3 8 11 0.177 0.0863 0.0952 0.4333 0.4778
2023-24 Vancouver Giants WHL 62 7 20 27 0.435 0.2119 0.2232 1.0638 1.1206
2024-25 Vancouver Giants WHL 66 6 30 36 0.545 0.2654 0.2654 1.3325 1.3325
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Colorado College D1 NCHC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Colorado College D1 NCHC FR 29 3 8 11 0.379
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2025-26 · Colorado College
+61.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6540
Defenseman overall
#1386
Defenseman born in 2006
#992
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

King's · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2004-05
1.200 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.