← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ollie Josephson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-07-22 Country: Canada
2024 · Round 4, Pick #105  ·  Seattle Kraken Seattle Kraken
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 WHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0811 0.0937 0.4090 0.4725
2022-23 WHL 63 5 14 19 0.302 0.1467 0.1626 0.7400 0.8205
2023-24 Red Deer Rebels WHL 68 12 35 47 0.691 0.3363 0.3563 1.6960 1.7968
2024-25 Red Deer Rebels WHL 48 14 21 35 0.729 0.3548 0.3569 1.7892 1.7999
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 38 6 14 20 0.526
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2025-26 · North Dakota
+72.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15933
Forward overall
#638
Forward born in 2006
#586
in WHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Miami (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.353 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2023-24
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.