← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ephram McNutt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-05-04 Country: Canada
Bentley
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Prince George Cougars WHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Prince George Cougars WHL 55 1 7 8 0.145 0.0708 0.0742 0.3570 0.3741
2023-24 Prince George Cougars WHL 64 3 12 15 0.234 0.1140 0.1138 0.5751 0.5743
2024-25 Prince George Cougars WHL 52 6 23 29 0.558 0.2713 0.2564 1.3684 1.2935
2025-26 Regina Pats WHL 66 13 40 53 0.803 0.3907 0.3512 1.9703 1.7712
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3455
Defenseman overall
#892
Defenseman born in 2005
#624
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Bentley Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2023-24
0.08
actual FR PPG at Bentley
NAHL 2017-18
0.39
actual FR PPG at Bentley
NAHL 2014-15
0.13
actual FR PPG at Bentley
USPHL-Premier-Classic 2014-15
0.33
actual FR PPG at Bentley

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2023-24
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2006-07
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.